On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:57:07 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This looks like bad test design. If the toolkit needs to be of a specific
>> type when running tests, then check that this is the case once before
>> running all the tests. As for this PR, I don't mind leaving it as is or
>> reverting these changes. I don't think that a CCE is realistic here.
>
>> As for this PR, I don't mind leaving it as is or reverting these changes. I
>> don't think that a CCE is realistic here.
>
> I agree that this isn't a good test design. I was just pointing out why it
> isn't (in theory) a completely compatible change. I don't really mind one way
> or the other here.
I can replace these with an assert:
assertTrue(Toolkit.getToolkit() instanceof StubToolkit);
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/959
