On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:55:34 GMT, John Hendrikx <jhendr...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Note: I ran into a `javac` compiler bug while replacing types with diamond 
>> operators (ecj has no issues).  I had two options, add a 
>> `SuppressWarnings("unused")` or to use a lambda instead of a method 
>> reference to make `javac` happy.  I choose the later and added a comment so 
>> it can be fixed once the bug is fixed.  I've reported the issue here: 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297428
>> 
>> - Remove unsupported/unnecessary SuppressWarning annotations
>> - Remove reduntant type specifications (use diamond operator)
>> - Remove unused or duplicate imports
>> - Remove unnecessary casts (type is already correct type or can be autoboxed)
>> - Remove unnecessary semi-colons (at end of class definitions, or just 
>> repeated ones)
>> - Remove redundant super interfaces (interface that is already inherited)
>> - Remove unused type parameters
>> - Remove declared checked exceptions that are never thrown
>> - Add missing `@Override` annotations
>
> John Hendrikx has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 23 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' of https://git.openjdk.org/jfx into 
> feature/fix-easy-warnings-in-controls
>  - Fix some indents and put declarations on one line where possible
>  - Replace StubToolkit casts with asserts (2)
>  - Revert read only property instanceof checks
>    
>    Added SuppressWarnings("cast") as these checks should be retained
>  - Replace StubToolkit casts with asserts
>  - Revert instanceof changes and replace with null checks
>  - Revert "Fix warnings in fxml"
>    
>    This reverts commit b148aa3cc8a4676167a9eb8a023cddce3de116e7.
>  - Fix warnings in fxml
>  - Add workaround for JDK-8297428 (javac compiler type inference bug)
>  - Remove unused imports
>  - ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/fbad15d1...1697bd1d

looks good

-------------

Marked as reviewed by angorya (Author).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/959

Reply via email to