On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:08:00 GMT, Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/property/adapter/Disposer.java
>> line 47:
>>
>>> 45: public class Disposer implements Runnable {
>>> 46: private static final ReferenceQueue<Object> QUEUE = new
>>> ReferenceQueue<>();
>>> 47: private static final Map<Reference<?>, Runnable> RECORDS = new
>>> ConcurrentHashMap<>();
>>
>> I don't really care for the suggestion that most IDEs seem to offer of
>> naming `static final` objects (as opposed to primitive types) using all
>> caps. This should be left up to the developer, and in this case I think the
>> existing names are fine and don't need to be changed. I note that this code
>> was borrowed from Java2D where a similar fix was done to add the generics,
>> but the names were left unchanged.
>
> I only use all-uppercase if the collection itself is immutable. Here, the
> collections/wrapper are mutable, so I wouldn't change the names either. A
> matter of style.
I reverted these changes.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/969
