On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:13:34 GMT, Marius Hanl <mh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Before, the `updateItem` method was called with the new value that was > committed via `commitEdit()`. > This is problematic as developers may setup a commit handler via > `setOnEditCommit`, which may reject the edit (or change the value otherwise). > We therefore do call the `updateItem(-1)` which will also call `updateItem` > but with the real underlying value. > > Changed and added tests for all 4 cells. This pull request has been closed without being integrated. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1197
