On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:44:07 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Probably you won't like `xxImpl` either? >> I'm not sure we should start adding `runMustBeOnFxThread` to every method >> name out there that should run on the FX thread. In this case, maybe we >> could simply add a small javadoc with a comment, and that's it. Neither will >> enforce a real check about that. > > I was also going to suggest `xxImpl` with a short javadoc comment. That is a > pattern we use elsewhere. I don't dislike the current name, but I can see > Jose's point. Changed to `xxImpl` with a doc comment. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1352#discussion_r1469655778
