On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:33:58 GMT, Lukasz Kostyra <lkost...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> JFX minimum requirements guarantee 9Ex availability, so old non-Ex paths are > no longer needed. > > In multiple parts (ex. Mesh, Graphics, etc.) where the Device is acquired I > changed the type to explicitly use `IDirect3DDevice9Ex`. Technically it > doesn't matter much (`IDirect3DDevice9Ex` inherits `IDirect3DDevice` - it was > leveraged to transparently use the Ex device in the backend) but now we don't > have the non-Ex device, so that keeps it a bit more consistent and clear IMO. > > Verified by running tests on Windows 11, did not notice any regressions. > Unfortunately I have no way to test this on older systems. I traced the issue to commit id 3914db26f3abb573ed0e320a361477e1d3e7a9ac, which is a merge Kevin did ~6 weeks ago. Placing the head on this commit or after causes the above error, but moving 1 commit back to "Create release notes for JavaFX 22" lets the application start normally. I understand that this PR has nothing to do with this, I just can't test it considering this problem. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1445#issuecomment-2076940263
