On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:16:24 GMT, Michael Strauß <[email protected]> wrote:
>> At least this way it is minimally invasive. I think removing the catch block >> would require more review and testing to be approved as that has the >> potential of changing the behaviour in edge cases with concurrent >> modifications, even if other methods don't check for it > > Sure, but we're here now, why come back to it later? As you point out, the > code has been like that for 10 years, so there's no need for a "quick" fix. @mstr2 we could address this investigation in a follow-up. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2037#discussion_r2694841680
