On Tue, 8 Sep 2026 15:11:13 GMT, John Hendrikx <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Looks like this might depend on @mstr2 's snapping work.
>> Maybe we ought to focus on #2262 first to avoid merging conflicts later.
>> What do you think?
>
> @andy-goryachev-oracle the merge was nastier than I thought it would be, but 
> it should be all good and RFR again now with all changes @mstr2 did in #2278 
> incorporated.

> @hjohn yes, my concern is that we have multiple PRs touching the same code in 
> non-trivial way, this makes it more difficult to carry the changes over and 
> to review them. Sorry, the reviews may take some time - we currently have 42 
> PRs open and this number is climbing.

FIFO order perhaps? :)

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2241#issuecomment-5591848636

Reply via email to