On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 18:26:26 GMT, Michael Strauß <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> We had a bit of internal discussion on the topic. ... Basically, this PR is >>> unlikely to go in without the system property. >> >> Is this how that is decided in, and I quote JavaFX's mission statement: "a >> collaborative effort by many individuals and companies"? Interesting >> information for all collaborators who don't count towards "we". > >> @mstr2 : sorry, I am not an official spokesman. I said it's unlikely, not >> "it's decided". There is a concern (of introducing application regression), >> and it should be addressed, or do you disagree? > > If there is any concern, then it should be discussed in this open forum. > Saying that an internal discussion has come to that conclusion skips all of > that. I agree with @mstr2. When I did read the message that this is unlikely to get merged or moved on, I was really wondering why. This is an improvement that many people on the mailing list have been asking for. We should not ignore that IMO. I understand any concerns really, but on the hand we also need to decide and discuss together. Not saying we should merge anything, but I would rather like to see us working together and may make this a change we are all confident in, tested with various application (and I think that together we have access to a wide variety of applications). All that should help to find a solution with minimal risk while still improving things. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2284#issuecomment-5623824467
