On Wed, 7 Oct 2026 15:29:32 GMT, Andy Goryachev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> yes, same thought. Shall I do in this PR? Otherwise I will create a ticket >> and clean it up afterwards. > > The usual argument for unrelated changes is to make them in a separate PR for > the sake or reviewers and backporters, but if we are touching this code we > might as well clean it up. This pattern was [deliberately introduced](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1608#discussion_r1819938688) so that static constants can be initialized from an expression. The alternative, stuffing unrelated initialization code into a static initializer, or having a static initialization method, has its downsides. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2299#discussion_r4221544154
