Hello, I think that an advantages of having an other organisation that the supported code and OpenLayers developers is clearer defined than if we have all on the same organisation.
CU Stéphane 2011/11/23 Eric Lemoine <[email protected]>: > Hi > > We at Camptocamp have developed a control that we'd like to propose as an > addin. We want to use Git and GitHub for this addin, and subsequent addins > we may develop in the future. We could place this addin under our > "camptocamp" GitHub organization, but we'd rather make it more "official", > possibly by having in the "openlayers" GitHub organization. > > I'm interested to know what people think. Is the "openlayers" organization > an appropriate home for addins? Or should we consider creating a new > "openlayers.addins" organization? The latter would prevent from having a > long list of repositories in the "openlayers" organization, but would imply > managing another GitHub organization. > > Thanks. > > -- > Eric Lemoine > > Camptocamp France SAS > Savoie Technolac, BP 352 > 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex > > Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96 > Mail : [email protected] > http://www.camptocamp.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev > > -- camptocamp.com mapfish.org _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
