Hello, Effectively your true the officials addins should go into the openlayers organization, and the unofficial addins can be listed on the wiki.
CU Stéphane 2011/11/23 Frederic Junod <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Eric Lemoine > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi >> >> We at Camptocamp have developed a control that we'd like to propose as an >> addin. We want to use Git and GitHub for this addin, and subsequent addins >> we may develop in the future. We could place this addin under our >> "camptocamp" GitHub organization, but we'd rather make it more "official", >> possibly by having in the "openlayers" GitHub organization. >> >> I'm interested to know what people think. Is the "openlayers" organization >> an appropriate home for addins? Or should we consider creating a new >> "openlayers.addins" organization? The latter would prevent from having a >> long list of repositories in the "openlayers" organization, but would imply >> managing another GitHub organization. > > The (official) addins should go into the openlayers organization; I > think that the number of repository is not an issue. > > fredj > > -- > Frédéric Junod > Camptocamp SA > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev > -- camptocamp.com mapfish.org _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
