--On Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:38 AM +0200 Pierangelo Masarati
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:01 -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:54 PM +0200 Pierangelo Masarati
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't remember the details, but I'm pretty sure there's no binary
> compatibility between database files created by OpenLDAP 2.1 and
> OpenLDAP 2.3; in general, you shouldn't expect anything like that when
> moving across minor versions. As Quanah already pointed out, migration
> from minor to minor should be done via (old)slapcat/(new)slapadd,
> which,
s/minor to minor/major to major/
AFAIK, in general it is unsafe to assume that 2.1 database files can be
used by 2.3... that's what I call "minor".
Ah... I consider releases like 2.1.20 to 2.1.22 to be a very minor
upgrade... But I guess that is just patchlevel. ;) 2.1 and 2.3 might be
the "minor" numbers, but they are major upgrades. :P
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
