-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Somebody in the thread at some point said: | | Andy Green wrote: | |> Werner sorry I am confused now. Elsewhere you are recommending against | |> using rfkill for WLAN? | | | | No, I'm not recommending against using rfkill. If you want to | | suppress RF transmission in a reliable way, e.g., because you're | | on a plane or about to enter an ICU, rfkill is a good choice. | | | | I'm only saying that there are better choices than rfkill if | | you're looking for a power saving mechanism. | | Ah fair enough. | | So to be clear we have rfkill as RF kill and pull the module as power | management.
Thanks for the patch, sent it on stable-tracking. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklwbzwACgkQOjLpvpq7dMqVrgCbBz1/bu8eOBx4e7m6TJtk0FvY ZC8AnjSCg/8NaRfhDKmfSGnClURlL+9o =YIhI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
