On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:54:36PM -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Sven Rebhan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 2009/3/31 Nelson Castillo <[email protected]>: > >> We decided to send the patch-set to the OM kernel first in case someone > >> can spot something wrong. If we are failing to credit someone please > >> let us know. Most Signed-off-by entries were not touched. We should be > >> sending > >> this upstream ASAP (in 2 days or so). > > > > This is really great news! You probably also want to include the patch from > > > > http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/openmoko-kernel/2009-March/009709.html > > Sure. Adding it to the patch-set.
Sorry, the merge window is already in progress, and nothing more is being accepted via the ARM tree. Please, next time, we need to see stuff at-least by rc3 or so to allow a full review and some testing before getting it merged. I'm already in enough trouble with Russell for the late patches turning up before the merge window. > > Btw, the proposed branch didn't boot on my machine. Maybe it's just a > > config issue, but maybe not. So you should try to boot such a kernel > > yourself. I would be very interested if you manage to boot into a root > > system. > > Yes, it boots. > > $ ssh r...@gta02 > r...@gta02's password: > r...@om-gta02:~# uname -a > Linux om-gta02 2.6.29-mokodev #1 PREEMPT Tue Mar 31 12:14:17 COT 2009 > armv4tl unknown > > I forgot to mention that this patch-set is based on the latest Linus > tree as specified in the linux-arm-kernel FAQ. I asked Ben if he > preferred another tree for this but I guess this one is OK. > > > Best regards and thanks for your effort! > > This time the effort is mostly Andy's. But now the submission work > starts... Let's find out what bounces. > > N.- > -- -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
