On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Sven Rebhan <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/3/31 Nelson Castillo <[email protected]>: >> Yes, it boots. >> >> I forgot to mention that this patch-set is based on the latest Linus >> tree as specified in the linux-arm-kernel FAQ. I asked Ben if he >> preferred another tree for this but I guess this one is OK. > > I there any change you share this tree on the openmoko git? I would > love to give it a try on my FR.
Yes, we should do it. What I tried is actually an updated version of the proposed branch that is there... Anyway, it would be something similar to the "proposed" branch Andy created, but we should actually track the Linus tree. This way the patches should be ready for upstream submission. This branch should be named "for-rmk" or something like that, right? (Remember we need to CC Ben when we submit there). Not all the drivers in andy-tracking are ready for this and perhaps we should forget about them temporally so that we can actually get something upstream. There is some interest in linux-arm-kernel for the Touchscreen driver and it seems that the OM driver could be in good shape very soon. I should be sending it soon there for an early review/test (there's a long thread about it). I think Werner didn't like the "proposed" branch. He was planning a new layout for the repository so let's see what he thinks about this. I guess we should have a "for-rmk" branch and try to get things upstream in every merge window. If you really want to try this now you can clone the Linus tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git). There's no need to tell you this, but I'll write it here in case someone else wants to try it out: cp arch/arm/configs/gta02_defconfig .config ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE="ccache /usr/local/openmoko/arm/bin/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-" make uImage
