On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:35:27PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > I agree that this workflow is not optimal. But as long as the official > Debian kernel package is developed this way. It does not make things > easier for pkg-fso to deviate from this scheme. The complete > disconnection of the current pkg-fso kernel package > (linux-image-2.6.29-openmoko) from the Debian kernel package is one > reason why it has not been updated for a long time now.
> IMHO all kernel development should be done in the openmoko kernel git > repository. As has already been pointed out in this thread the most direct way of simplifying things here is probably to work to push the code directly upstream.
