Excerpts from Mark Brown's message of Don Aug 26 14:59:04 +0200 2010: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:35:27PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > > I agree that this workflow is not optimal. But as long as the official > > Debian kernel package is developed this way. It does not make things > > easier for pkg-fso to deviate from this scheme. The complete > > disconnection of the current pkg-fso kernel package > > (linux-image-2.6.29-openmoko) from the Debian kernel package is one > > reason why it has not been updated for a long time now. > > > IMHO all kernel development should be done in the openmoko kernel git > > repository. > > As has already been pointed out in this thread the most direct way of > simplifying things here is probably to work to push the code directly > upstream.
I totally agree. I just wanted to propose the openmoko repository as a short term staging ground instead of the completely unsuitable debian packageing tree someone mentioned. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
