asf is running *away* from that.

On Dec 1, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Jason Baldridge <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anything that makes it easier to do mostly in-browser editing of site
> content makes it easier to keep things up to date, so I'm in favor of
> anything that supports that.
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Please consider using the new Apache CMS system for most of the
>> content. Feel free to use the maven site plugin if you like to
>> generate reports and such. My personal experience is that using maven
>> site as the primary mechanism for an entire project is a road to pain.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we have to create a new project website.
>>>
>>> The current one is just a bunch of html files,
>>> which had been pushed with maven to the sourceforge
>>> web space after an update.
>>>
>>> The mentor guide says
>>> "It is recommended that an initial site is uploaded as soon as possible".
>>>
>>> Should we just stay with html, or use one of the
>>> popular choices over at Apache:
>>> - Apache Maven
>>> - Apache Velocity Anakia
>>> - XSLT
>>>
>>> Over at UIMA we use Anakia, should we use
>>> it here as well, any opinions ?
>>>
>>> Jörn
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jason Baldridge
> Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics
> The University of Texas at Austin
> http://comp.ling.utexas.edu/people/jason_baldridge

Reply via email to