You can create an INFRA ticket in JIRA.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Can I request the setup of the new CMS myself, or should > it be done by a mentor ? > > Jörn > > On 12/1/10 9:39 PM, Jason Baldridge wrote: >> >> +1 for the CMS. >> >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Thilo Goetz<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 12/1/2010 20:46, Jörn Kottmann wrote: >>> >>>> To use the new CMS we have to request it from the Infrastructure >>>> team like the stanbol people did: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3199 >>>> >>>> Should we try the new CMS? >>>> >>> +1 for the CMS. I'm not a great fan of markdown, but >>> it beats both html and anakia IMHO. However, I have >>> no strong opinion... >>> >>> --Thilo >>> >>> >>> Any opinions? >>>> >>>> For me it seems that the new CMS is now the new conventional way of >>>> managing website at Apache and its easy to do, so +1 for me to >>>> go this way. >>>> >>>> Jörn >>>> >>>> On 12/1/10 7:08 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here is a link with background information about the new CMS: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2010/10/22/evolution-of-apaches-websites/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The suggest way to use the CMS is to write the content in Markdown. >>>>> >>>>> Here is a link to the stanbol project site in svn: >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/site/trunk/ >>>>> >>>>> The layout must be as described here: >>>>> http://www.staging.apache.org/dev/cms.html#layout >>>>> >>>>> Jörn >>>>> >>>>> On 12/1/10 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Please consider using the new Apache CMS system for most of the >>>>>> content. Feel free to use the maven site plugin if you like to >>>>>> generate reports and such. My personal experience is that using maven >>>>>> site as the primary mechanism for an entire project is a road to pain. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Jörn Kottmann<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we have to create a new project website. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The current one is just a bunch of html files, >>>>>>> which had been pushed with maven to the sourceforge >>>>>>> web space after an update. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The mentor guide says >>>>>>> "It is recommended that an initial site is uploaded as soon as >>>>>>> possible". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Should we just stay with html, or use one of the >>>>>>> popular choices over at Apache: >>>>>>> - Apache Maven >>>>>>> - Apache Velocity Anakia >>>>>>> - XSLT >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Over at UIMA we use Anakia, should we use >>>>>>> it here as well, any opinions ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jörn >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >
