Overall, artifacts look good. From a packaging standpoint:
* NOTICE.txt needs the JWNL copyright statement in it per the terms of BSD * UIMA reference should also be in the NOTICE (as should any other dependency that requires it). Technically, since we aren't redistributing the library, I don't think need to, but I think we should for completeness. How come the UIMA stuff isn't in the binary? Just curious. -Grant On Mar 21, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hello, > > our next RC is ready for testing, compared to RC 4 it fixes > a bug in the creation of the sample UIMA PEAR package (OPENNLP-143). > > It can be found here: > http://people.apache.org/~joern/releases/opennlp-1.5.1-incubating/rc5/ > > Testing is now mostly done, and we are ready to release soon. > See our test plan for details: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/TestPlan1.5.1 > > Jörn >
