Hi all, I can help with testing the UIMA training support with annotated test data crawled from various websites since I'm going to do that for a college course I'm speaking to, so I'd be happy to help (any hints on which pieces need stronger tests is welcome). Tommaso
2011/3/29 Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> > On 3/29/11 7:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> On Mar 29, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> >> On 3/29/11 6:03 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >>> >>>> Overall, artifacts look good. >>>> >>>> From a packaging standpoint: >>>> >>>> * NOTICE.txt needs the JWNL copyright statement in it per the terms of >>>> BSD >>>> >>>> * UIMA reference should also be in the NOTICE (as should any other >>>> dependency that requires it). Technically, since we aren't redistributing >>>> the library, I don't think need to, but I think we should for completeness. >>>> >>>> How come the UIMA stuff isn't in the binary? Just curious. >>>> >>> There are different ways to run OpenNLP in UIMA, one is to create the >>> sample pear >>> and start it up in the uima document analyzer, but that one is >>> distributed with UIMA. >>> >>> Anyway I will fix the NOTICE file as suggested by Grant for RC 6, I hope >>> we are then >>> ready to release, >>> >> With the next candidate, you should call a vote. We need at least 3 PPMC >> votes that are +1 and no -1's. Votes from others should be taken seriously >> as well. I typically treat a -1 from anyone as binding or at least >> warranting further investigation. Once the PPMC vote passes, then we must >> ask the Incubator PMC to vote. This is only needed while in the Incubator. >> >> I would also recommend reading http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >> > > Thanks, through my work on UIMA I am aware with this process. The reason I > did not ask for the vote yet was that a little testing > is still missing and that I wanted the packaging being checked. If every > thing goes well I will call the for the vote next week on RC6. > > Jörn >
