I think the redesign of opennlp.maxent into opennlp.ml should not be pinned
down by the previous API. I say this mainly because the current design has a
lot of obvious problems, including poor encapsulation and a proliferation of
methods for different options that could be handled much more cleanly. So, I
propose a fairly clean break with the past API. Thoughts?

Jason

-- 
Jason Baldridge
Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics
The University of Texas at Austin
http://www.jasonbaldridge.com
http://twitter.com/jasonbaldridge

Reply via email to