Sounds good. I'd like to start working on this after our spring semester has ended (two more weeks). -Jason
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/2/11 11:13 PM, Jason Baldridge wrote: > >> I think the redesign of opennlp.maxent into opennlp.ml should not be >> pinned >> down by the previous API. I say this mainly because the current design has >> a >> lot of obvious problems, including poor encapsulation and a proliferation >> of >> methods for different options that could be handled much more cleanly. So, >> I >> propose a fairly clean break with the past API. Thoughts? >> > > Yes, I agree, but there should be a very strong focus on only break > backward > compatibility once. In this case I suggest that we use the re-naming also > to align the version with the opennlp-tools and opennlp-uima project. > > Before we actually change anything I suggest that we work on a proposal > on how the new API could look, what do you think? > > Jörn > -- Jason Baldridge Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics The University of Texas at Austin http://www.jasonbaldridge.com http://twitter.com/jasonbaldridge
