On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 11:03 -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Paul Donohue wrote: > | All of the build-tree stuff it's doing is being automatically done by > cdbs... > | > | I'm not all that familiar with cdbs myself... > | > | I wonder if it's looking in the wrong place for the sources? Try > setting "DEB_SRCDIR = $(CURDIR)" in debian/rules... > | https://perso.duckcorp.org/duck/cdbs-doc/cdbs-doc.xhtml#id2480198 > | > | I haven't compiled iplike and jicmp in quite a while, but I don't > remember having any trouble the last time I did it, so I'm not really > sure what might have changed to cause this behavior. > > Yeah, the cdbs thing is kind of weird. It actually expects a tarball in > the same directory that the debian/ dir is, and doesn't care about the > local build files at all.
I suspect this can be changed but I guess when it finally gets to debian it would build with the usual tar + patches approach? > > ie, the way to make it work is to do: > > m4/autogen.sh > ./configure Damn, it doesn't like my openjdk-1.6: configure: searching for a 1.5 jdk configure: trying the value in JAVA_HOME configure: checking if /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun is home for a valid 1.5 jdk checking if /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun has java... yes checking if /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun has javac... no configure: no valid jdk found at /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun checking for java... /usr/bin/java configure: attempting to find the jdk for /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java. configure: checking if /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre is home for a valid 1.5 jdk checking if /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre has java... yes checking if /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre has javac... no configure: no valid jdk found at /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre configure: error: unable to find a valid jdk for java version 1.5 I guess now is not the time to mention how much I dislike autotools? > make > make dist > dpkg-buildpackage > > > I don't understand debian's build stuff enough to change it to just pack > up the local stuff instead of requiring the extra step of making a > tarball, but if you do that, it should work. > > > - -- > Benjamin Reed > The OpenNMS Group > http://www.opennms.org/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFIRAvcUu+jZtP2Zf4RAkfKAJ9tXg2e2klaKndMItmZebfMJ7/UpACglGET > NGymBQQGavIjPun29BNw2RE= > =ZDL+ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: > http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ > > opennms-devel mailing list > > To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this > page: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel -- Alex Bennee, Software Engineer In seeking the unattainable, simplicity only gets in the way. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
