> I assume it's not substantially different from the archive I pulled from
> you a while back?
No, it's only subtly different.  I've made a lot of very minor changes since 
then, but if you're not pushing commits up to subversion, you probably wouldn't 
notice any of the differences.

> One thing that does grate a little is the multiple project branches, for
> example I've pulled the debian magic into my main branch because I'm
> always building packages. I guess a proper setup would use sub-project
> support.
Yeah ... I still haven't figured out any particularly elegant way to deal with 
this.
In my repo, I do 'mkdir debian ; echo debian >> .git/info/exclude'
Then just created another independent git repo within the subdirectory just for 
the debian stuff.

The sub-project stuff doesn't look particularly clean or easy to me, but I have 
to admit I haven't played with it enough to really know if it can or can't work 
well for something like this.  (But if you figure it out, let me know!)

> Thanks for doing the initial conversion by the way, having a git repo
> makes life a lot easier for a "distributed" developer like me :-)
No problem. :)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ:
http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ

opennms-devel mailing list

To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this 
page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel

Reply via email to