DJ Gregor wrote:
> This email is informational and I also want to pose a question.  My
> question, first: I'm interested in merging the fix for this bug to
> 1.6-testing so it makes it into 1.6.3, but people will have to upgrade
> their surveillance-views.xml after this fix has been applied.  What do
> you think?
> 
> http://bugzilla.opennms.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2987

I'm not sure I'm comfortable with doing that in 1.6 when we're already
looking at getting 1.8 out in the April timeframe.  It's only a few
months, and a rather invasive (but necessary) change.  Better to let it
smoke-test in trunk for a few months.


-- 
Benjamin Reed
The OpenNMS Group
http://www.opennms.org/


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ:
http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ

opennms-devel mailing list

To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this 
page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel

Reply via email to