On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:00:45 -0500, "Benjamin Reed" <ran...@opennms.org>
said:
> DJ Gregor wrote:
> > This email is informational and I also want to pose a question. My
> > question, first: I'm interested in merging the fix for this bug to
> > 1.6-testing so it makes it into 1.6.3, but people will have to upgrade
> > their surveillance-views.xml after this fix has been applied. What do
> > you think?
> >
> > http://bugzilla.opennms.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2987
>
> I'm not sure I'm comfortable with doing that in 1.6 when we're already
> looking at getting 1.8 out in the April timeframe. It's only a few
> months, and a rather invasive (but necessary) change. Better to let it
> smoke-test in trunk for a few months.
Ah, I forgot that 1.8 was coming out so early. Sounds great, and I see
that you've already changed the target milestone on the bug. Thanks!
- djg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ:
http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ
opennms-devel mailing list
To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this
page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
