On 1 June 2011 13:46, Benjamin Reed <ran...@opennms.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/1/11 6:20 AM, kernel-hac...@bennee.com wrote:
>> This patch adds support for slippy maps
>
> This is really cool, but I still really am not enamored with the idea of
> having *2* slippy map implementations, one of which only works with
> OpenLayers.  Is there something technical that prevents you from adding
> features to the Remote Poller Maps (which supports OpenLayers, Google
> Maps, and MapQuest with the same data) so they are more generically
> useful, rather than 2 competing slippy maps?

Only two really:

1. My time to learn an re-implement on GWT
2. Getting support for the WMS layer working within GWT framework

However we'll quite happily carry it as an extra patch in our tree
until the unification can occur.

-- 
Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/
http://www.half-llama.co.uk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. 
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ:
http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ

opennms-devel mailing list

To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this 
page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel

Reply via email to