This is the pull request I’m talking about: https://github.com/OpenNMS/opennms/pull/329 <https://github.com/OpenNMS/opennms/pull/329>
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Ronny Trommer <ro...@opennms.org> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Dustin made a small but quite important enhancement to the > DnsResolutionMonitor. Instead of always using the system resolver it is now > possible to set a preferred DNS server as resolver by configuration of the > monitor. This allows to check if a node label can be resolved of a specific > DNS server instead of using the underlying resolver configuration from the > operating system. > > There are also some refactorings, so would be nice if somebody can do a code > review. Otherwise the pull request is against > release-16.0.3. > > My question is this something we can do? As far I see the configuration file > is not changed and provides an additional parameter and still works in the > same way if the name server parameter is not set. > > If we merge to release-16.0.3 is the change automatically merged to develop? > > Thanks for reading and for this cool enhancement > -rt
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
