On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:01:45AM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Le 29. 01. 15 11:28, Paul Fertser a ecrit :
> > IMHO, organisational issues, mostly. It would really help if the
> > contributors would be more persistent about their patches, and also if
> > they would actively try to find reviewers, e.g. among their coworkers.
> >
> I have 2 patches is this state. Should I "spam" the list to ask for
> reviewer ?

If you are just asking for review, it's not spamming. So yes, in case
the patches are not getting any feedback for too long, you can write
to the mailing list, you can complain on IRC, etc. You can also add
relevant people (those who contributed related code lately) via
Gerrit's CC feature.

> Or should I use an other email address to add a fake
> reviewer ?

Fake reviewers do not help improve code quality. But real reviewers
often do.

Most of us have coworkers or friends or fellow students who work in
related field. So when you're sending a patch, why not ask them to
review it? It's not hard, and it's fun, and you have a chance to
discuss your code with them (and sometimes it helps a lot, see "rubber
duck debugging").

> Don't take me wrong, I have no emotion about this situation. I
> already have experienced this on others projects. I just try to
> figure out what action I could do the make the process flowing.

If you have any suggestions about how we can realistically improve the
experience for the contributors, we're open to the discussion, really,
we need more feedback on all the areas, both user experience, and
developer experience.

-- 
Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software!
mailto:fercer...@gmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to