On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 10:23 +0100, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: > What makes you think that? My understanding of the design is that > it's > centered on adding new metadata sections to ELF binaries and make > the > debugger use this metedata. This looks quite embedded-friendly to me. >
Maybe I got the wrong impression, sorry. But the problem is that this project doesn't seem very active... Generally fragmenting the effort (yet another library with yet another standard and so on...) doesn't seem like a very good idea to me, that's why in my opinion a solution implemented completely in GDB would be better suited and would have a higher chance of "survival" and "adoption". But I might got the wrong impression again. However me and Liviu had a discussion about describing RTOS structure in a generic way and I'm still pretty certain that this is generally not possible in a generic and agnostic way. In the end it would become either extremely complex or you'd have to implement some kind of scripting/code to actually deal with that. Regards, FCh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
