> On 16 Jul 2023, at 21:37, Tomas Vanek <tom_...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > The counter has a good reason: it's an easy way to check if PendSV_Handler() > is really called > and the debugger does not mask interrupts. I see. In my test I did not check the value of this counter, I assumed that if the debugger halted at the start of the handler, resuming execution also incremented the counter. If someone thinks that this detail is relevant for the bug report, I can rerun the test and check the counter. Liviu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tommy Murphy
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tomas Vanek
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tommy Murphy
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tommy Murphy
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tomas Vanek
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tomas Vanek
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tomas Vanek
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tomas Vanek
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tommy Murphy
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tommy Murphy
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Liviu Ionescu
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Tomas Vanek
- Re: semihosting unexpected breakpoint not acknowledged Michael Schwingen