On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Dean Glazeski <dngl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jeff, > > I think we all need to take a deep breath for a second. The project is > managed in SVN, there can be a revert of changes to a different revision and > Zach or some one else can repeat the warning removal process. Warning > removal is much more trackable than the stuff you have accomplished. I > think that is why Øyvind requested a patch against your version of > OpenOCD. It may be salvageable if there is a rollback of current work. All > is not lost.
It's also possible that someone else will attempt the merge but the patch submitter.... Zach is getting a lot of noisy patches out of the way, this will make for a SVN HEAD to create patches against... -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
