If you post patches and vouch for them, then I, or another committer who beats me to it, will commit them promptly.
Currently the problem is that there are patches posted, but nobody has time to say anything as to whether they are ready for testing. I think it would be *greatly* helpful if we could break these changes into a series of harmless patches and then a final patch to flip the switch... Keeping all patches small & well understood. W.r.t. "vouching", I'm not saying that you should guarantee that they work, but if you can simply state what testing you did then we have much better understanding of the expected quality and robustness of these patches. The *real* testing only happens after the patches are committed. That's just how the OpenOCD community works at this point. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
