Zach Welch wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 00:18 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
>   
>> Zach Welch wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:53 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote: 
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Info : J-Link compiled Feb 20 2006 18:20:20 -- Update --
>>>>> Info : JLink caps 0x3
>>>>> Error: J-Link command EMU_CMD_GET_MAX_MEM_BLOCK failed (-110)
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Open OCD seems to get reasonable ansvers from first two JLink commands.
>>>>
>>>> The /* query hardware maximum memory block */ should not be run for this
>>>> version, I had removed it in my patch. Next patch will use results from
>>>> JLink caps to select what info to query.
>>>>
>>>> I am waiting for more info from Segger about version diffrences and
>>>> endpoints.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> How are we doing with this patch?  It looks like we have made some good
>>> progress this week, so I don't want the effort to stall.
>>>
>>> What are the thoughts about committing your latest version?  Even if
>>> more changes may be pending, it seems that your work has improved things
>>> for folks with some devices, so I think we have made constructive
>>> progress from where we were before now.  If nothing else, we should get
>>> some more testing feedback. ;)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Zach
>>>   
>>>       
>> There is a set of new patches that has been tested by Michael Fischer, 
>> as far as i know there were no problems.
>>
>> There are still things that should be fixed in the resethandling in 
>> jtag_add_reset and minimizing the differences between ft2232 and jlink 
>> behaviour.
>> But still would suggest that the following patcches are commited. They 
>> are not untested.
>>     
>
> I will apply them here and see if they magically cure my own woes.
> Regardless, I think these changes should be committed in some for,
> though I can see various ways that I would like to clean your code.
> Would you mind my taking a pass over them before I commit them?
>
>   
Sure,  I am out of style discussions on this list.
> Incidentally, do you think this might also solve the problem that was
> just reported by Dylan Reid?  I have cc'd him in the hope that he will
> try your patches and report the latest results.
>
>   
It should help, but from the info given it is hard to tell what actually 
broke.


_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to