On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Xiaofan Chen<xiaof...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Michael Fischer<fische...@t-online.de> wrote:
>> if the installer support more than FT2232 device, it must install
>> all the driver this way. I think it is not a good idea, and the
>> user should point to the directory where the driver exist.
>> Like the normal way of installing driver.
>>
>
> I see what you mean. Unfortunately this is sometimes the
> only way to install the libusb-win32 device driver based on
> my past experience. Windows will favor the existing
> WHQL based FTDI driver and refused to install the
> non-certified libusb-win32 driver.
>
> This is part of the complication of using libusb-win32 and
> libftdi under Windows. I agree with Freddie, FDT2xx is the
> nature choices for Windows user.

The solution can be to build a binary package to automatically
do this. libusb-win32 has an example of using NSIS. It is also
possible to use other open source installers.
http://libusb-win32.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libusb-win32/trunk/libusb/examples/
http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page


-- 
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to