David Brownell pisze: > Not clear on the status of those LPC2xxx things. I think they'd > be ready to go if they didn't set up bogus clock rates...
All I'm doing is waiting for your suggestion to solve the "bug" (for me that's not a bug [; ) - as I really see no other way for that stuff to work without another 7 levels of abstraction just because "clock rate doesn't belong to target"... Unfortunately - for LPC2xxx it does. If the scripts are supposed to be user friendly, then I see no other way, as every other suggestion is harder than the method I suggested: changing the files - just like now - but this time the frequency is visible and described. So what should I do? 4\/3!! _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
