On Monday 05 October 2009, Austin, Alex wrote: > Since many people seem to not be fond of sourceforge,
AFAIK that's just the email. Which has issues like crappy archives, bad spam filtering, ads, and such. > have you considered GitHub? In terms of GIT support is it significantly better than SourceForge? > Just put a README.markdown in the > project and it will become a nice webpage front for the > project. We need a bit more than that from the web face. Current notions include making the website give better access to the project docs: the User's Guide, and the doxygen Developer's Guide output. > They already provide source browsing and snapshots > available via HTTP, Everyone seems to run "gitweb", so that's not going to be a compelling advantage to any service. > and make it trivially easy for anyone > to (a) fork the project Already easy, courtesy of GIT. :) > and (b) make changes in forks > available to the original project. Plus, we could always use > their Wiki for a project page. We'd need someone to volunteer to manage and evolve a Wiki. And some folk don't like them. That particular change merits a separate discussion. Note that SourceForge supports wiki stuff too. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
