Hi David, hi all,

first of all i have to say that it was not my intention to upset
the developers here. Sorry. I was very happy that you
fix the R13_svc bug in the second i had report it..

>> I agree. Nonetheless this error shouldn't occur in the official
>> snapshot on the website.
> I must have missed the notice that *during the merge window* it
> became reasonable to treat arbitrary snapshots as being release
> quality.  Could you point out some agreement where that changed??

No, they don't have to. They even can be not functional
at all or contains errors. I agree.
The error i mentioned was in 0.31.
I will check that again and report it.
I don't mean the r13_svc!

> Somehow I had always thought that development trees were expected to
> have short term minor breakage every now and then.  That's just part
> of how things work.

Yes, right.

>> In this case the $SUBJECT goof had been fixed in the tree for at
> least a day when you complained.  It appeared only on a platform that
> most of the developers don't actually use ... yet still it was in the
> tree for less than eighteen hours.

Yes, that was perfect.
I don't mean r13_svc here!
I mean the official 0.31.
 
Best Regards,



Carsten
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to