On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> > wrote: >> Why hasn't anybody complained yet that "flash write_image erase" will >> fail for elf images that are not aligned to sectors??? >> >> Unlocking is automatically aligned to sectors in this case... >> >> I'll be committing this soonish if I don't hear any protests or insights... > > ISTR quite some discussion over this a few months ago resulting in the > change TO the current behaviour. The rationale being that it's > unexpected/rude/dangerous to silently alter memory outside the range > being loaded. I seem to agree with that. The REVISIT comment suggests > a better solution: let the user force padding to erase sectors with an > additional 'pad' argument, or fail with a helpful error message > otherwise.
The padding scheme is implemented now. -- Øyvind Harboe US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
