Øyvind Harboe wrote: > >> Perhaps it would be a good idea for some target family scripts > >> to have some required options, such as amount of RAM > >> for chip? Perhaps with a default to the minimum possible > >> amount of ram. > > > > Makes sense. I think in general it would be nice to tidy a little in > > tcl/target/ - sometimes there's a per-chip cfg, other times there's > > just a family cfg. The latter is great as long as it works, but then > > it would need to use the least common denominator, which may be a > > problem for the largest parts in the same family. > > Patches welcome! :-)
Fair enough. Always the tradeoff between using and producing tools. As much as I dislike things ftdi it'd be nice to touch up that driver a little. Going to libftdi-1.0 would be a somewhat major change I think, but small simple fixes might be to get rid of the segfault when JTAG adapter is not plugged, and if the adapter is unplugged while OpenOCD is running then it goes into some loop printing error messages. Anyway, I'd like to do more testing with the Versaloon. > Good target/board scripts can do wonder for the "OpenOCD experience..." Yes, I would even say that they are key. Have to refresh those Tcl skills. > Some scripts are also a lot of work to put together. No doubt. Especially if they are to be really generic. //Peter _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
