Hello Open'ers! :-) David, we will complement and complete our achievments soon and make them even better after intensive testing - still I hope You are the swd works coordinator in OpenOCD and you find some time to hint me with its internals.. as I dont have clue on how to debug yet? ;-P When my swd bitstream api os ready and working with urjtag i can get into openocd.
As I mentioned I am working on pretty reusable API generating the SW-DP bitstream, wrappped into two-way queue, that could be wrapped into a target specific calls.. and some additional helper fumctions to make it easy :-) i will share the sources on http://swd.sf.net after some cleanup and i get the router at my new location (next week in worst case). Freddie, this is free and open source project, so no way to enforce rush from anyone on anyone, the work is in progress. I have managed to include this project somehow with my current tasks so I can put some more time into it, but I had to reschedule it from march too and it collides with some others tasks as well... The delays are unavoidable in a real world, and each second costs money - this is why I try to document it as well I can to spare this time for further implementation in openocd, so you wont have to reseach again :-) Best regards, Tomek ps/2: regarding the previous thread the openocd is not yet as stable as rock - it still need some improvements and features, what is clearly visible when looking at the patch aplication frequency. I think that more frequent build releases might help it more user triendly, but still there must be a person that could volountairly accomplish this task. Ps//3: damn xell phone :-P On 30 Nov 2010 17:01, "David Brownell" <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > On 30 Nov 2010 08:46, <freddie_cho...@op.pl> wrote: > > >... > > > > Have you synchronized your work with that of Tomek Cedro? > It should go the other way around. The only part of my work that's not yet > been public is a driver that first needs test-time; OpenOCD integration has > been on-going. Nobody has bothered asking any > technical questions, though, or even commenting on > the framework patch (with SWD transport). Not one > technical suggestion has been offered. > > That's not how to work on community projects... > > The only other public SWD work has been Simon's,but that's not been aimed > at OpenOCD mergability; more > in the "useful HW-specific prototype" category. > > - Dave > >
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
