On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Michael Schwingen <rincew...@discworld.dascon.de> wrote: > Am 04/27/2011 11:50 AM, schrieb Tomek CEDRO: >> Hello :-) I think default-low-speed is safer choice for unaware users >> or developers simply reading out idcode.. also it can be easily >> changed into something more device specific to gain better performance >> :-) > Hi, > > this brings us back to the question: what speed is low enough to work in > all circumstances?
I'm not looking for something that works in all circumstances. I just want it to be the *same* across all interfaces. The correct long term solution would be to have *no* default speed and just put up an error message if the script doesn't specify it. IMHO. > So I think having no default and forcing the user to specify a value > might be the way to go. Agreed. If we could have that patch first and not go the detour of a fixed default across all interfaces, then that would be my choice too. Patch anyone? -- Øyvind Harboe Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
