On 14 July 2011 10:05, Luca Bruno <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD scrisse:
>
>
>> > But these are not really a real release, created by make dist.
>> > Surely we should be running make dist then uploading the releases to
>> > sourceforge/berlios etc.
>> >
>> > Have you had a look at tools/release.sh?
>> I did, as we have nothing for rc3
>> I'll use it for the first tarball release
>> and will push the tarball on sf.net
>>
>> if for the rc4 we have nothing again we will post pone it
>> for one week
>
> I'm not sure what you're referring to with "we have nothing for
> rc3" (HEAD had progressed since rc2 tag).
>
> Anyway, I have two pending patches, already sent for review,
> regarding "real releases" (namely populating changelog and avoiding
> git-describe on tarball). I'd like to hear comments and hopefully get
> them committed before next rc.
>

Looking at your patches now.

Cheers
Spen
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to