On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> Ah, a lot better than my quick attempt. Thanks. The question just
> remains: do we really want Tk stuff here, too? I mean, wouldn't it be
> better under with_tcl to just provide the libpgtcl.so stuff only? And,
> is there still any Tk/X11 stuff distributed with PostgreSQL which we
> also install?
The only application of pgtcl I am aware of is pgaccess which requires Tk.
I also haven't seen anybody who installs Tcl but drops Tk.
--
,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst
dWWMWM" - :GM==; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless
9WWMm==-.
"-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
