On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > Ah, a lot better than my quick attempt. Thanks. The question just > remains: do we really want Tk stuff here, too? I mean, wouldn't it be > better under with_tcl to just provide the libpgtcl.so stuff only? And, > is there still any Tk/X11 stuff distributed with PostgreSQL which we > also install?
The only application of pgtcl I am aware of is pgaccess which requires Tk. I also haven't seen anybody who installs Tcl but drops Tk. -- ,eM""=. a"-. Michael van Elst dWWMWM" - :GM==; [EMAIL PROTECTED] :WWMWMw=--. "W=' cable & wireless 9WWMm==-. "-Wmw-" CABLE & WIRELESS ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]