Looks like our mail system cut out my shell script based on it's extension. I gzip'ed it instead here.
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 10:03, David M. Fetter wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 22:27, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > > Shouldn't the newer version of the software and the openpkg revision > > > make it so they don't want to be updated? > > > > Yes, these should be not downgraded. How can this happen to you? > > Perhaps is the UPD 00INDEX.rdf.bz2 not read here? > > Currently, I'm sync'ing a local copy of the SRC for 2.1, doing some > cleanup, reindexing and then doing the upgrade. I'm not sync'ing over > the UPD dir at this time. I was assuming that simply by having the > newer revision installed, the openpkg tools would identify it as such > and thus not attempt any update ever since the version in SRC is not > newer. If I sync both SRC and UPD, will the openpkg tools automagically > identify the newest version, ignoring the other versions and use that > for the updates? I was under the impression that this wouldn't work > either and it would instead be confused by the two different versions. > I attached the script I'm using to do this work for you to look at. It > should explain in detail what's going on. Please correct me if I'm > mistaken in any of these assumptions. Thanks. -- David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu "Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
opkg-update.sh.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
