> > Anyhow, I am wondering why the decision was made to move the milter > include > > files to milter/*.h instead of the default libmilter/*.h? If > something really > > needs the includes in milter/*.h maybe a symbolic link should be made > so it > > works for both locations. > > Maybe I am just missing something, but any ideas would be helpful. > > Simply because a package named "foo" should provide its includes in > <prefix>/include or <prefix>/include/foo and not in any other location.
So another decision might be to rename the milter library to "libmilter" and provide the include files in libmilter/*.h Milter is the actual program running as a mail filter, libmilter is the library to link against. I see enough arguments to keep the default paths of software. The naming scheme for the OpenPKG packages shold reflect these. My vote is for a package named "libmilter" with default paths from the authors. I vote against patching "mimedefang". Birger ------ [EMAIL PROTECTED], Network Operations Center, Karlsruhe ______________________________________________________________________ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
