On Thu, Dec 04, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote: > On a related note, is there any reason you didn't go to rsync-2.5.7 instead > of updating rsync-2.5.6? > It is our policy to not change vendor versions and backport patches for 100% compatiblity. Even if some strange client looks for the server version it won't notice a difference. The only exception to that rule is fsl which is a OSSP project driven by and and made for OpenPKG - so we understand the scope of changes and compatiblity is under our control.
> When I saw the security advisory last night from > Rsync, I got the tarball, changed the Version number in the rsync.spec > file, and it rebuilt without problems. I've been running that on our > servers here since then without noticeable ill effects. > That's what we did with CURRENT. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cable & Wireless ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
