But with a small change to the rc script (it could check the existence of a
valid runlevel rc?.d directory and only use it if found) all other scripts can
be hold unchanged, eaven after package updates.
Alex
C�pia Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >So far so good, but while does the rc command doesn't also use a rc?.d
>
> >structure so that
> > /opkg/etc/rc bind start
> >will run the script linked to the currend runlevel /opkg/etc/rc?.d (not
> just
> >rc.d) making it easy to control what starts with rc all start / stop
> ?
> >seams to be a small hack to the rc script
>
> The Linux systems (current SuSE and old Caldera) I have here all have
> a
> ``runlevel'' command that returns the current run level, and it would
> be
> trivial to use that within indivudual %{l_prefix}/rc.d/rc.$package
> scripts.
>
> It seems to me that this is only important for a very limited set of
> packages so it would be better to let the individual packages handle
> it
> where appropriate rather than hack the openpkg rc script to do it.
>
> Bill
> --
> INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
> UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
> FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206)
> 236-1676
> URL: http://www.celestial.com/
>
> Instead of giving money to found colleges to promote learning, why
> don't
> they pass a constitutional amendment prohibiting anybody from learning
> anything? If it works as good as the Prohibition one did, why, in
> five
> years we would have the smartest race of people on earth.
> -- The Best of Will Rogers
> ______________________________________________________________________
> The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
> User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
